Kathryn Warner's marvellous Edward II book was re-viewed previously in BBC History magazine, and the reviewer, Professor Nicholas Vincent responded to Kathryn's work on the possible survival of Edward was 'entirely speculative'. In the April edition of the magazine, historian Ian Mortimer has written a superb response to the review, praising Kathryn's research and telling us to look at the contemporary evidence rather than the later evidence by certain academics ( though obviously not those who think Edward spent his entire reign making out with Piers).
Mortimer wrote a terrific book, 'Medieval Intrigue' in which he challenges those academics who will not even consider the likely survival of Edward II, when there is plenty of contemporary evidence. It's ironic in the week when Richard III was re-buried was all pomp and ceremony, where we've had Ricardians on TV protesting his innocence blaming Shakespeare for his tarnished reputation, a work of fiction, where there is plenty of contemporary evidence to condemn him, and yet certain academics rely on chroniclers writing well after the death of Edward as their sources, and won't consider the contemporary evidence.
If only Shakespeare had written such a superb play about Edward II as he did with his pantomime villain Richard, we may well have had The Edward II Society fighting to find out his true story. Richard has a lot to thank Shakespeare for;).
3 days ago
3 comments:
Ooooh, thanks for posting! To have Ian Mortimer praising my work in BBC History Magazine is just fab!
Congratulations to Kathryn! Thank you for posting about it, Anerje :-)
Happy Easter to you and Piers, Anerje :-)
Post a Comment