Wednesday, 19 February 2020

Book Review – Edward II’s Nieces, the Clare Sisters, by Kathryn Warner


I’ve been looking forward to this book for some time, and it was well worth the wait.  The Clare sisters tells the story of Edward II’s three nieces, from his sister’s marriage, Joan of Acre, to Gilbert ‘the Red’ Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hertford.  The Clare sisters were Eleanor, Margaret and Elizabeth.  Their brother Gilbert was killed at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314, thus ensuring his sisters inherited his wealth and lands.  The three sisters lived remarkable lives, and were indeed used as pawns of the crown, most noticeably by their uncle, Edward II, who used their marriages to bring his favourites into his family and bind them close to him.  Although it was his father, Edward 1st, that arranged the marriage of the eldest, Eleanor, to Hugh Despencer the Younger, and long before he became the favourite of Edward II.

Kathryn’s book draws on the excellent research she is known for, and although there is scarce information on the feelings of the sisters and their marriages, Kathryn doesn’t make the mistake of putting words into their mouths.  So why have no idea how the sisters felt about their marriages, but they certainly new their duty and what was expected of them.  They were pawns in the marriage game.  

The Clare sister I am most interested in, of course, is Margaret, wife of Piers Gaveston.  She was an excellent bride for Piers.  Edward used Margaret to bring Piers into his family, under his protection, and the couple were made the Earl and Countess of Cornwall.  We don’t know how Margaret felt about marrying Piers, or the relationship between Piers and Edward II.  However, there is no reason to suppose Margaret was upset or displeased with the match.  Why should she be?  She had married quite possibly the most influential and powerful man in the country – although this was dependent on her husband’s relationship with her uncle, Edward, and there is no doubt of the devotion and love that Edward felt for Piers.  For Margaret, it was a spectacular match, and there is no reason to think she was unhappy.  She dutifully followed her husband into exile in Ireland, and as Warner points out, she may well have enjoyed having her husband to herself.  No doubt being Countess of Cornwall was prestigious for her, and being a few years younger than her husband, she was an ideal companion for Edward’s wife, Isabella of France.  What a strange Christmas 1309 at Langley might have been – with perhaps Isabella and Margaret left to their childish chatter while their husbands made the most of their time together.  Tragically, events were to overtake everyone, and after Piers was unlawfully killed in 1314, Margaret was left a widow with a young baby daughter, Joan Gaveston.  Edward cared for both his niece and great niece, and it was to be expected that Edward ensured Joan Gaveston was well cared for by his sister Mary, a nun at Amesbury. 
Remarkably, Edward later married Margaret to another of his favourites, Hugh Audley, whilst the 3rd sister, Elizabeth, after a short first marriage, married another of his favourites, Roger Damory.  What makes truly fascinating reading though is Edward’s sudden infatuation with the husband of his eldest niece, Hugh Despencer.  How and when this happened, we don’t know, and we also don’t know Eleanor’s role in the relationship.  The husbands of both Margaret and Elizabeth rebelled against Edward and his new favourite Hugh Despencer – what a complicated set of relationships!  Both sisters suffered as a consequence.  But Eleanor and her husband Hugh soared in the King’s favour.  Warner raises the intriguing idea of perhaps Eleanor being the secret mistress of Edward II – it seems possible in the evidence Warner presents.  The marriage of Eleanor and Hugh seems a happy one, and they produced numerous children.  Both Eleanor and her husband were ambitious, even to the point of allowing one of their younger children to be brough up in another noble man’s house from a young baby.  Warner points out that Eleanor must have known how ruthless and grasping her husband was, and she seemingly wasn’t opposed to his actions.   When both her uncle and husband fell, Eleanor was imprisoned in the Tower, and her sisters released from their imprisonment.  I found myself disliking Eleanor as the book progressed, which I’m sure wasn’t Warner’s intention.  But the character of Eleanor Despencer is intriguing – if only there was more evidence available that makes clear exactly what her relationship was with her uncle – was she his mistress, or was this a charge levelled at Edward II to blacken the character of her uncle by portraying him in an incestuous relationship with his niece, or did she ruthlessly exploit the relationship between her uncle and husband?  A fascinating read into the insight of 3 powerful pawns in the marriage game of 14th Century politics.



2 comments:

  1. Thanks for the great review! Really glad you enjoyed the book! Writing Eleanor's story in the 1320s also made me see her and her relationship with Hugh in a very different light, and I agree with you, it's entirely possible she was just as ruthless and manipulative as he was! Fascinating people for sure, if not very likeable! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have totally changed my view of Eleanor after your book. One thing for sure, none of the Clare sisters come across as shrinking violets unhappy in marriages with their Uncle's favourites. Marriage pawns they might have been, but they made the most of their marriages. Congratulations on a thought provoking book!

    ReplyDelete