May 19th,
1312, had seen the surrender by Piers Gaveston
at Scarborough Castle. Initially,
Piers and Edward II had agreed that Piers
would stay at Scarborough Castle and prepare for a siege, whilst Edward would
do his best to rally support. For
whatever reason, (and I’ll discuss this
in another post), there was no long term
siege.
Piers had
surrendered to Aymer de Valence, Earl of Pembroke,
and the Earl of Surrey, after returning without permission from his third
exile. The terms of the surrender were most favourable to Piers (the most
likely reason he surrendered, maybe). Pembroke would take Piers
to St Mary’s Abbey in York, where it was hoped the king, Edward, and either
Thomas of Lancaster or his someone chosen by him, would come to an agreement
about Piers. If an agreement could not be reached by 1 August, Piers would
be allowed to return to Scarborough.
Pembroke, Surrey and Percy of Northumberland swore an oath that they
would protect Piers and return him unharmed to Scarborough. All 3 promised to forfeit their property if
they broke the oath. Piers himself swore
that he would not try to influence the king.
Edward and Piers surely had no doubt such a serious oath would be kept.
When
Pembroke arrived in York, there is no mention of Lancaster being present. Seymour Phillips, in his biography of Edward
II, says the lack of Lancaster being mentioned may mean that Pembroke had not
consulted the other nobles when agreeing to the surrender of Piers. This could well be true, as the terms of the
surrender were so favourable, and Lancaster, and Guy of Warwick, may have felt
they were not bound by the agreement. The
chronicler of the Vita Edwardi Secundi says
that Edward was playing for time, and hoped to ensure the support of his
Queen’s father, Philip of France, and the Pope, who would come to his aid and help to save
Piers.
There’s
no mention of whether Edward and Piers met for the last time at York. In fact, we don’t even know if Pembroke took
Piers to York. Edward must surely have been relieved that
Piers was in the custody of someone like Pembroke, and having sworn to protect
Piers, Edward now assumed his efforts could be fully focused on finding a way
to keep Piers with him and to appease his barons. Of course,
his plans came to nothing, as by June 19th, Piers had been
killed. In my next post, I’ll look more
in depth at the role of Pembroke’s oath and actions.
Great post! Coming up to such a sad anniversary :(
ReplyDeleteVery interesting post, Anerje! I'm looking forward to the next one. I would love to learn more about the role Pembroke played in the events. He was the trustworthy one, I asume?
ReplyDeleteThanks Kathryn and Kasia. Sometimes when you reflect on the events, you do look at them in a different light. I've been thinking a lot about Pembroke's role - it's obvious to me that Edward trusted him to guard Piers with his life, and that once again, he would find a way to save Piers. Despite the surrender, both must have been feeling very hopeful.
ReplyDeletedo you know about meaning of Piers Gaveston's Coat of Arms ?
ReplyDeleteI would be very appreciated if you tell me about it.