A
continuation of my previous post.
11. Of course, it wasn’t all Piers fault he was
like a second king – Edward was equally blamed. The St Paul’s Annalist
tells us – ‘if any of the earls or magnates sought the king’s special grace
with regard to any business, the king sent him to Piers’. What else are favourites for?:)
12. The Lanercost
puts it a bit more bluntly. "There was not anyone who had a
good word to say about the king or Piers."
Except each other, maybe?
13. Murimuth points the
finger at Piers again! Edward was ‘ruled
by Piers’ counsel, despising the counsel of the other nobles and of those whose
counsel especially used by his father’.
14. I can imagine
this being a headline from a newspaper today – it’s from the Vita Edwardi
Secundi and reflects on Edward’s
decision to leave Piers as Regent as he heads to France for his wedding. ‘ What an astonishing thing, he was lately an
exile, an outcast from England, has now been made governor and keeper of the
land.’ Shocker, eh?:)
15. Time from
another classic from the Vita. "The earls and barons he despised, and
gave them insulting nicknames".
Most of these were reported much later, after the death of Piers. The only contemporary nickname concerns Guy
of Warwick – the ‘Black dog of Arden’.
16. One for speculation here from the Vita. It concerns a Christmas Edward and Piers
spent together, in 1307. Apparently,
they spent the time "making up for former absence by their long wished-for
sessions of daily and intimate conversation’.
I do hope Piers didn’t have too
long a Christmas present list. Feel free
to use your own imagination here as well!
17. Piers loved the Earl of Richmond! Well, so says John of Canterbury – Piers
loved him "beyond
measure." Thankfully for Edward II,
he adds Piers called him ‘father’ and Richmond called him ‘son’, and then to
complicate it further, Piers addressed him as his ‘dear cousin’.
18. Wallingord 1307 saw a triumphant Piers
holding a tournament and trouncing the opposition. The Vita says ‘Sir Piers' side could not
raise an earl, but almost all the younger and more athletic knights of the
kingdom, whom persuasion or hope of reward could bring together, assisted him.’ The new knights on the block, I presume!
19. Oh dear – talk about sour grapes! The Vita says
"So it was in this tournament his party had the upper hand and
carried off the spoils, although the other side remained in possession of the
field. For it is a recognised rule of this game that he who loses most
and is most frequently unhorsed, is adjudged the most valiant and the
stronger." How can losing be ‘most valiant’?
20. Edward loves Piers – as his dear brother! ‘When the King's son saw him he fell
so much in love that he entered upon a compact with him, and chose and
determined to knit an indissoluble bond of affection with him, before all other
mortals’. Erm, a case of Piers
scornfully rolling his eyes upwards? A shrug of the graceful shoulders and a
‘whatever’?
These are just great ;) The moaning after the tournament really does sound like sour grapes, doesn't it? It's always interested me about Piers and Richmond - they do seem to have been close.
ReplyDeleteLOL Kathryn - yes, the comments after the tournament are ridiculous. I'm surprised none of the barons said 'I let him win':> As for Piers and Richmond - I guess knowing Richmond's age might shed some light on it - and you're bound to know lots more about Richmond - surrogate father?
ReplyDeleteI love all the quotes, but was it really that bad that "There was not anyone who had a good word to say about the king or Piers", I wonder. Did they really have only each other to rely on?
ReplyDeleteerm, yes Kasia:> seriously, I think there was an awful lot of jealousy over Piers - I think the nobles were annoyed he had the king's ear and they didn't think him worthy of being an Earl or suitable to advise Edward. I'm sure Thomas of Lancaster saw himself as Edward's guiding light, with all his titles and being his cousin.
ReplyDeleteand to be honest, I think Piers and Edward were perfectly happy to have each other to rely on, and no-one else.
ReplyDeleteI guess you're right about the two being perfectly happy to have only each other. I can't help it, but it's so very very romantic...
ReplyDeleteLol! Certainly is!
ReplyDeleteIt seems every chronicle that ever complained about a king added a bit about listening to the wrong advisors / being in company of the wrong sort of men. Edward and Heinrich IV could exchange notes. :-)
ReplyDeleteyes Gabriele, you're right - and I think jealousy plays a big part as well.
ReplyDelete