Arriving at
the theatre, my heart sank a little at the scenery – which looked like a
disused warehouse. The play started with
Edward II’s coronation, with the actor playing Edward pausing for long periods
for effect as the king made his vows.
This was promising, I thought. But
from that point, the play proved a huge disappointment. The play had no clear setting – it was a
mixture of traditional and modern – the king wearing casual trousers but a
magnificent golden robe and sitting on a fine throne. Actors were wearing suits of armour – but with
animal heads. And then some characters
changed sex. I could cope with the Earl
of Pembroke becoming a woman – and I mean being referred to as ‘she’, and not
an actress playing the role as a man.
But what I couldn’t cope with was Edward’s brother, the Duke of Kent,
being a woman – so, he no longer had a brother, but a sister. What this added to the play, I just don’t
get. The actress playing the role wore a
‘power-dressing’ trouser suite with high heels, and spent a lot of time
wandering aimlessly around the stage with no real purpose.
Naturally, I
awaited Piers Gaveston’s arrival with eagerness. The actor playing him, Kyle Soller, made his
entrance from the back of the stalls, climbing up on a wall and holding onto a
railing. This production makes it quite
clear that the prejudice the barons have against Piers is that he is an upstart
and as a Gascon, an outsider. Which is
why I presume he spoke with an American accent.
True, Soller is an American, but did they really have to have Piers
speaking in an American accent to hammer home he was an outsider? In a way, Soller’s performance stereotyped
Piers as a brash American. And Piers was
clad in jeans and a leather jacket to just hammer it home further. Apart from the accent, Soller gave a
reasonable performance, and John Heffernan as Edward II aroused some sympathy
for Edward, but the production also showed how petulant and, no other word for
it, lurid, Edward and Piers’ behaviour could be. However, there were some parts of the play
which were actually played for laughs, which just seemed so wrong.
The most
annoying aspect of this production was the use of 2 screens on either side of
the stage which was used to film the actors when hidden on the stage or at the
side of the stage. OK, it was adventurous
– but when I go to the theatre, I would like to see the actors live on
stage. The stage set incorporated
collapsible staging with ‘rooms’ on stage that the audience couldn’t see – so we
had to rely on the screens whilst the actors were filmed on sometimes shaky
video cameras. We were presented with
the nobles plotting against Gaveston on 2 giant video screens with the actors
actually on stage but unable to be seen by the audience. Similar scenes included ‘Spencer’ and Baldock
being filmed outside the theatre and being relayed on screen. We were also treated to Edward, Piers and
their followers ‘partying’ with occasional flashes of light, bodies merged
together and blaring music. There were
more scenes presented like this, but hopefully you get the gist of my gripe of
using screens/cameras instead of us seeing the scenes on the actual stage.
Vanessa
Kirby’s Queen Isabella drank and smoked too much, summoning her son, the
prince, to refill her glass and light her cigarettes which caused much of the
audience to howl with laughter. Likewise
when Edward and Piers enjoyed an extremely long, passionate kiss, not caring
who saw them, and then a 3 way kiss with Spencer, a lot of the audience laughed
– purely because the production
played it for laughs.
As for
Prince Edward – ok, I could cope with an actress playing the prince, but her
age and size were inappropriate. Queen
Isabella had to carry this ‘child’ at some points – a fully-grown woman dressed
in shorts and a blazer! Ridiculous! Even more so was the tune of the Hokey Cokey
after a battle scene – yes, honestly!
As in the previous
production of Edward II I saw about 2 years ago, the ‘murderer’ Lightborn was
played by the same actor who had played one of the king’s favourites –
previously it was ‘Spencer’, and now it was Kyle Soller who played Gaveston –
clearly to add to the drama of the murder of the king. First we had to suffer Edward shuffling
around the back of the stage in shorts and t-shirt, being filmed on a handheld
camera and viewed on the giant screens. A
huge plastic sheet was brought out, and we have Edward pinned down and murdered
by the red hot poker and then dragged off stage by the plastic sheet.
One review I
read said the production was like Marmite – you’ll either love it or hate
it. I can’t say that I hated it – but it
was certainly a huge disappointment, with far too many gimmicky things going
on.
