Tuesday, 1 November 2016

Wedding of Piers Gaveston and Margaret de Clare

November 1st, All Saints Day, marks the anniversary of Piers Gaveston and Edward II's niece Margaret de Clare.  The couple were married at Berkhamstead Castle in 1307.  Margaret was around the age of 14, and Piers was probably in his mid 20's.   It was a fine match for Piers - and Margaret!  Margaret was the second daughter of Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Hertford, and the king's sister, Joan of Acre.   She was a royal bride and could expect a worthy marriage.   What better, as far as Edward II was concerned, than to marry his favourite into the royal family?  According to the Vita Edwardi Secunda, Edward wanted the marriage to 'to strengthen Piers and surround him with friends'.Margaret also gained - her new husband was the Earl of Cornwall.

Whatever anyone thought of the wedding, Edward was determined to give the couple a wedding to remember.  Jewels were presented to the couple, Margaret received a palfrey worth £20, and pennies to the value £7 10s 6d  were thrown over the couples heads at the church door.  The ladies-in-waiting received cloth of gold and pearls as presents. The king himself attended, as did the Earl of Pembroke.  Edward was in a generous mood - he made a payment to Richard le Kroc of Berkhamstead of 5s for damages caused to the property during the celebrations.  

The historian Seymour Phillips makes the point that Gilbert de Clare would never have agreed to marrying his sister to Piers if Edward and Piers had been lovers.  Likewise, he says Phillip 4th would never have allowed his daughter Isabella to marry Edward if he knew of the relationship.   I think this is a very naive point of view.  Marriage contracts were usually arranged and signed without due regard to the bride's feelings.  Gilbert de Clare was close in age to both Piers and Edward, and would have known what the relationship between the pair was.  He would also have known both Edward and Piers would have wanted marriages - it was their duty to marry and hopefully provide heirs.   His sister was strengthening family ties by marrying the King's favourite.  The fact Piers was Earl of Cornwall, and his sister would now be a Countess, added to the honour and prestige of the family.  We don't know what Margaret's views were, though she if often portrayed in historical fiction as a naive, unwilling girl - but she was only 14, knew her duty to her family and her king, and who knows, she may have just found the charismatic, handsome and impeccably mannered Piers to her liking.











This is an aerial view of Berkhamstead Castle - all that remains of it.
Source: Hamilton's 'Piers Gaveston, Earl of Cornwall'.
Seymour Phillips 'Edward II'

8 comments:

Kathryn Warner said...

Happy wedding anniversary, Margaret and Piers! ;-) It does annoy me how so many people assume Margaret was unhappy and 'tragic'. She may well have been delighted to become a countess at marriage and to marry a man so rich and high in favour!

Anerje said...

Exactly Kathryn. How many other women married 'straight' men and were unhappily married? Just look at Thomas of Lancaster and his wife.

Kasia Ogrodnik said...

Belated wedding anniversary wishes :) I somehow missed this post...

Anerje said...

Kasia - Piers would be happy to receive good wishes at any time:)

Kasia Ogrodnik said...

I'm sure he would :) Thank you for your comment to my latest blog post, Anerje. I have been very busy, but hope to return to regular Henry the Young King blogging in January :) Hope you are well :)

Anerje said...

It's a very busy family time Kasia - I'll look forward to more on the Young King in 2017.

Gabriele Campbell said...

She got a handsome, well mannered tournament fighter, not a tottering old geezer. I think she was quite happy about that. I can see Piers as a bit of a boygroup star with the girls. :-)

Anerje said...

Oh yes Gabriele- I'm sure that's exactly how Piers appeared! Love it! And she gets made a countess as well!